JEPQ vs PRGFX: 42% overlap
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock share 42.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.6. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
JEPQ and PRGFX hold 29 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in JEPQ | in PRGFX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.3% | 13.8% | 6.4% |
| AAPL | 6.4% | 11.1% | 4.7% |
| MSFT | 4.8% | 9.1% | 4.3% |
| AMZN | 4.0% | 4.9% | 0.9% |
| META | 3.0% | 3.9% | 0.9% |
| TSLA | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.1% |
| AVGO | 2.2% | 5.1% | 2.9% |
| NFLX | 2.1% | 1.9% | 0.1% |
| AMD | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.5% |
| LRCX | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.8% |
Where JEPQ and PRGFX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | JEPQ | PRGFX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 22.3% | 5.9% | +16.4pp |
| Information Technology | 37.9% | 48.2% | −10.3pp |
| Consumer Staples | 6.3% | 0.8% | +5.5pp |
| Financials | 0.5% | 5.1% | −4.6pp |
| Industrials | 1.7% | 5.6% | −3.9pp |
| Cash & Other | 0.0% | 3.5% | −3.5pp |
| Health Care | 4.2% | 6.5% | −2.2pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 1.8% | 0.0% | +1.8pp |
Δ is JEPQ minus PRGFX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
52.1% of JEPQ by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.
29.9% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of JEPQ.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| JEPQ | PRGFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 40.0% | 62.8% |
| Positions held | 108 | 79 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $35 | $64 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do JEPQ and PRGFX overlap?
JEPQ and PRGFX overlap 42.0% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 29 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between JEPQ and PRGFX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If JEPQ holds a stock at 6% and PRGFX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both JEPQ and PRGFX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 42.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does JEPQ own that PRGFX doesn't?
JEPQ holds 108 positions and PRGFX holds 79; 79 of JEPQ's positions don't appear in PRGFX at all, and they are 52.1% of JEPQ by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares JEPQ and PRGFX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch JEPQ vs PRGFX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.