JEPQ vs XLRE: 0% overlap

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund share 0.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.2%
JEPQ expense ratio
0.35%
XLRE expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

JEPQ and XLRE hold 2 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin JEPQin XLREΔ
PLD0.2%9.1%8.9%
CASH1.8%0.0%1.8%

Where JEPQ and XLRE differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorJEPQXLREΔ
Real Estate0.2%99.9%99.7pp
Information Technology37.9%0.0%+37.9pp
Unclassified22.3%0.0%+22.3pp
Communication Services12.0%0.0%+12.0pp
Consumer Discretionary10.0%0.0%+10.0pp
Consumer Staples6.3%0.0%+6.3pp
Health Care4.2%0.0%+4.2pp
Cash and/or Derivatives1.8%0.0%+1.8pp

Δ is JEPQ minus XLRE, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in JEPQ
106 positions

96.4% of JEPQ by weight, held in no part of XLRE.

Only in XLRE
31 positions

90.8% of XLRE by weight, held in no part of JEPQ.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

JEPQXLRE
Top 10 holdings40.0%60.6%
Positions held10834
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$35$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do JEPQ and XLRE overlap?

JEPQ and XLRE overlap 0.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, XLRE as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between JEPQ and XLRE calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If JEPQ holds a stock at 6% and XLRE holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both JEPQ and XLRE?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does JEPQ own that XLRE doesn't?

JEPQ holds 108 positions and XLRE holds 34; 106 of JEPQ's positions don't appear in XLRE at all, and they are 96.4% of JEPQ by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares JEPQ and XLRE. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch JEPQ vs XLRE

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, XLRE as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.