JEPQ vs XLV: 4% overlap
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund share 4.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
JEPQ and XLV hold 11 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in JEPQ | in XLV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRG | 0.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| VRTX | 0.7% | 2.1% | 1.4% |
| REGN | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% |
| AMGN | 0.4% | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| ABBV | 0.4% | 7.8% | 7.3% |
| BMY | 0.3% | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| TMO | 0.2% | 3.6% | 3.5% |
| DXCM | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| GILD | 0.1% | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| UNH | 0.1% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
Where JEPQ and XLV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | JEPQ | XLV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 4.2% | 99.7% | −95.5pp |
| Information Technology | 37.9% | 0.0% | +37.9pp |
| Unclassified | 22.3% | 0.0% | +22.3pp |
| Communication Services | 12.0% | 0.0% | +12.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.0% | 0.0% | +10.0pp |
| Consumer Staples | 6.3% | 0.0% | +6.3pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 1.8% | 0.1% | +1.7pp |
| Industrials | 1.7% | 0.0% | +1.7pp |
Δ is JEPQ minus XLV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
92.7% of JEPQ by weight, held in no part of XLV.
67.7% of XLV by weight, held in no part of JEPQ.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| JEPQ | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 40.0% | 62.0% |
| Positions held | 108 | 62 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $35 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do JEPQ and XLV overlap?
JEPQ and XLV overlap 4.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 11 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, XLV as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between JEPQ and XLV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If JEPQ holds a stock at 6% and XLV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both JEPQ and XLV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 4.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does JEPQ own that XLV doesn't?
JEPQ holds 108 positions and XLV holds 62; 97 of JEPQ's positions don't appear in XLV at all, and they are 92.7% of JEPQ by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares JEPQ and XLV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch JEPQ vs XLV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, XLV as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.