MGK vs PRGFX: 70% overlap

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock share 70.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.3Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.3. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
70.3%
MGK expense ratio
0.05%
PRGFX expense ratio
0.64%

Top shared holdings

MGK and PRGFX hold 29 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin MGKin PRGFXΔ
NVDA13.2%13.8%0.6%
AAPL12.1%11.1%1.1%
MSFT7.5%9.1%1.6%
GOOGL5.9%7.0%1.1%
AMZN4.4%4.9%0.5%
AVGO4.3%5.1%0.9%
META4.1%3.9%0.2%
LLY3.4%3.0%0.4%
TSLA3.9%2.7%1.2%
V1.8%2.3%0.5%

Where MGK and PRGFX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorMGKPRGFXΔ
Information Technology58.6%48.2%+10.4pp
Unclassified0.0%5.9%5.9pp
Cash & Other0.0%3.5%3.5pp
Communication Services16.2%13.1%+3.1pp
Industrials2.6%5.6%3.0pp
Health Care4.9%6.5%1.6pp
Financials4.0%5.1%1.1pp
Real Estate1.2%0.5%+0.7pp

Δ is MGK minus PRGFX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in MGK
28 positions

21.5% of MGK by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.

Only in PRGFX
49 positions

18.2% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of MGK.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

MGKPRGFX
Top 10 holdings63.5%62.8%
Positions held5779
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$5$64

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do MGK and PRGFX overlap?

MGK and PRGFX overlap 70.3% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 29 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (MGK as of 2026-06-30, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between MGK and PRGFX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If MGK holds a stock at 6% and PRGFX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both MGK and PRGFX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 70.3% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: MGK 0.05% versus PRGFX 0.64%.

What does MGK own that PRGFX doesn't?

MGK holds 57 positions and PRGFX holds 79; 28 of MGK's positions don't appear in PRGFX at all, and they are 21.5% of MGK by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares MGK and PRGFX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch MGK vs PRGFX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, MGK as of 2026-06-30, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.