MGK vs SMH: 28% overlap
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF and VanEck Semiconductor ETF share 28.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — SMH as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
MGK and SMH hold 10 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in MGK | in SMH | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 13.2% | 19.6% | 6.4% |
| AVGO | 4.3% | 7.8% | 3.5% |
| AMD | 3.2% | 4.7% | 1.5% |
| LRCX | 1.9% | 4.6% | 2.7% |
| KLAC | 1.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% |
| AMAT | 1.1% | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| INTC | 1.1% | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| MRVL | 1.0% | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| CDNS | 0.5% | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| SNPS | 0.4% | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Where MGK and SMH differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | MGK | SMH | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 58.6% | 92.8% | −34.2pp |
| Communication Services | 16.2% | 0.0% | +16.2pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.2% | 0.0% | +11.2pp |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 7.2% | −7.2pp |
| Health Care | 4.9% | 0.0% | +4.9pp |
| Financials | 4.0% | 0.0% | +4.0pp |
| Industrials | 2.6% | 0.0% | +2.6pp |
| Real Estate | 1.2% | 0.0% | +1.2pp |
Δ is MGK minus SMH, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
71.7% of MGK by weight, held in no part of SMH.
42.3% of SMH by weight, held in no part of MGK.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| MGK | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 63.5% | 72.2% |
| Positions held | 57 | 26 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $5 | $35 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do MGK and SMH overlap?
MGK and SMH overlap 28.3% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 10 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (MGK as of 2026-06-30, SMH as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between MGK and SMH calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If MGK holds a stock at 6% and SMH holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both MGK and SMH?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 28.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does MGK own that SMH doesn't?
MGK holds 57 positions and SMH holds 26; 47 of MGK's positions don't appear in SMH at all, and they are 71.7% of MGK by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares MGK and SMH. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch MGK vs SMH
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, MGK as of 2026-06-30, SMH as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.