PRGFX vs TLT: 0% overlap
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
PRGFX and TLT hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in PRGFX | in TLT | Δ |
|---|
Where PRGFX and TLT differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | PRGFX | TLT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 100.0% | −100.0pp |
| Information Technology | 48.2% | 0.0% | +48.2pp |
| Communication Services | 13.1% | 0.0% | +13.1pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.7% | 0.0% | +10.7pp |
| Health Care | 6.5% | 0.0% | +6.5pp |
| Unclassified | 5.9% | 0.0% | +5.9pp |
| Industrials | 5.6% | 0.0% | +5.6pp |
| Financials | 5.1% | 0.0% | +5.1pp |
Δ is PRGFX minus TLT, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
96.6% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of TLT.
100.0% of TLT by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| PRGFX | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 62.8% | 100.0% |
| Positions held | 79 | 3 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $64 | $15 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do PRGFX and TLT overlap?
PRGFX and TLT overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, TLT as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between PRGFX and TLT calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If PRGFX holds a stock at 6% and TLT holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both PRGFX and TLT?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does PRGFX own that TLT doesn't?
PRGFX holds 79 positions and TLT holds 3; 78 of PRGFX's positions don't appear in TLT at all, and they are 96.6% of PRGFX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares PRGFX and TLT. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch PRGFX vs TLT
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, TLT as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.