PRGFX vs VTV: 4% overlap
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock and Vanguard Value ETF share 3.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
PRGFX and VTV hold 13 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in PRGFX | in VTV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE | 2.1% | 0.7% | 1.3% |
| MS | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| DHR | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| TMO | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| UNH | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| TMUS | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| MRSH | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| SYK | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| SHW | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| INTU | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Where PRGFX and VTV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | PRGFX | VTV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.2% | 14.1% | +34.2pp |
| Financials | 5.1% | 22.1% | −17.0pp |
| Communication Services | 13.1% | 2.9% | +10.3pp |
| Industrials | 5.6% | 15.0% | −9.4pp |
| Health Care | 6.5% | 15.1% | −8.7pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.8% | 8.7% | −7.9pp |
| Energy | 0.0% | 6.8% | −6.8pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.7% | 3.9% | +6.7pp |
Δ is PRGFX minus VTV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
90.7% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of VTV.
94.0% of VTV by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| PRGFX | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 62.8% | 23.6% |
| Positions held | 79 | 309 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $64 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do PRGFX and VTV overlap?
PRGFX and VTV overlap 3.5% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 13 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, VTV as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between PRGFX and VTV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If PRGFX holds a stock at 6% and VTV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both PRGFX and VTV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 3.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does PRGFX own that VTV doesn't?
PRGFX holds 79 positions and VTV holds 309; 65 of PRGFX's positions don't appear in VTV at all, and they are 90.7% of PRGFX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares PRGFX and VTV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch PRGFX vs VTV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, VTV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.