PRGFX vs XLV: 6% overlap

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund share 5.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
5.9%
PRGFX expense ratio
0.64%
XLV expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

PRGFX and XLV hold 6 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin PRGFXin XLVΔ
LLY3.0%16.1%13.1%
ISRG1.4%2.0%0.7%
SYK0.5%1.9%1.4%
DHR0.4%2.1%1.7%
TMO0.3%3.6%3.3%
UNH0.3%6.6%6.3%

Where PRGFX and XLV differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorPRGFXXLVΔ
Health Care6.5%99.7%93.3pp
Information Technology48.2%0.0%+48.2pp
Communication Services13.1%0.0%+13.1pp
Consumer Discretionary10.7%0.0%+10.7pp
Unclassified5.9%0.0%+5.9pp
Industrials5.6%0.0%+5.6pp
Financials5.1%0.0%+5.1pp
Cash & Other3.5%0.0%+3.5pp

Δ is PRGFX minus XLV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in PRGFX
72 positions

90.7% of PRGFX by weight, held in no part of XLV.

Only in XLV
55 positions

67.5% of XLV by weight, held in no part of PRGFX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

PRGFXXLV
Top 10 holdings62.8%62.0%
Positions held7962
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$64$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do PRGFX and XLV overlap?

PRGFX and XLV overlap 5.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 6 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, XLV as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between PRGFX and XLV calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If PRGFX holds a stock at 6% and XLV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both PRGFX and XLV?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 5.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does PRGFX own that XLV doesn't?

PRGFX holds 79 positions and XLV holds 62; 72 of PRGFX's positions don't appear in XLV at all, and they are 90.7% of PRGFX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares PRGFX and XLV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch PRGFX vs XLV

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, PRGFX as of 2026-03-31, XLV as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.