PRWCX vs VT: 21% overlap
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF share 21.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — PRWCX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
PRWCX and VT hold 47 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in PRWCX | in VT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| NVDA | 3.0% | 4.0% | 1.0% |
| MSFT | 4.2% | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| AMZN | 4.8% | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| GOOGL | 2.3% | 1.8% | 0.4% |
| AVGO | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| META | 3.7% | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| LLY | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| AMD | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| JPM | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Where PRWCX and VT differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | PRWCX | VT | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasuries | 18.2% | 0.0% | +18.2pp |
| Unclassified | 20.3% | 3.8% | +16.5pp |
| Financials | 2.4% | 14.9% | −12.5pp |
| Information Technology | 17.8% | 30.1% | −12.3pp |
| Industrials | 0.9% | 11.5% | −10.6pp |
| Cash & Other | 5.0% | 0.0% | +5.0pp |
| Utilities | 7.1% | 2.5% | +4.6pp |
| Health Care | 12.2% | 7.7% | +4.5pp |
Δ is PRWCX minus VT, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
42.0% of PRWCX by weight, held in no part of VT.
76.5% of VT by weight, held in no part of PRWCX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| PRWCX | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 46.0% | 20.5% |
| Positions held | 151 | 9,600 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $72 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do PRWCX and VT overlap?
PRWCX and VT overlap 21.2% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 47 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (PRWCX as of 2026-03-31, VT as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between PRWCX and VT calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If PRWCX holds a stock at 6% and VT holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both PRWCX and VT?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 21.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does PRWCX own that VT doesn't?
PRWCX holds 151 positions and VT holds 9,600; 103 of PRWCX's positions don't appear in VT at all, and they are 42.0% of PRWCX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares PRWCX and VT. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch PRWCX vs VT
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, PRWCX as of 2026-03-31, VT as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.