QQQM vs VV: 54% overlap
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF share 53.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — QQQM as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
QQQM and VV hold 91 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in QQQM | in VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 8.4% | 7.3% | 1.1% |
| AAPL | 7.6% | 6.7% | 0.9% |
| MSFT | 5.7% | 4.4% | 1.3% |
| AMZN | 4.4% | 3.6% | 0.7% |
| GOOGL | 3.5% | 3.3% | 0.2% |
| AVGO | 2.9% | 2.8% | 0.1% |
| GOOG | 3.3% | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| MU | 2.5% | 2.1% | 0.4% |
| META | 3.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| TSLA | 3.9% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Where QQQM and VV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | QQQM | VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 0.2% | 11.6% | −11.3pp |
| Information Technology | 48.9% | 38.1% | +10.8pp |
| Industrials | 3.0% | 9.0% | −6.0pp |
| Communication Services | 15.6% | 10.0% | +5.7pp |
| Consumer Staples | 8.5% | 4.5% | +4.0pp |
| Health Care | 5.2% | 8.9% | −3.7pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.9% | 9.1% | +2.8pp |
| Unclassified | 2.7% | 0.1% | +2.6pp |
Δ is QQQM minus VV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
4.4% of QQQM by weight, held in no part of VV.
46.0% of VV by weight, held in no part of QQQM.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| QQQM | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 46.7% | 36.6% |
| Positions held | 103 | 434 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $15 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do QQQM and VV overlap?
QQQM and VV overlap 53.9% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 91 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (QQQM as of 2026-02-28, VV as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between QQQM and VV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If QQQM holds a stock at 6% and VV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both QQQM and VV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 53.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does QQQM own that VV doesn't?
QQQM holds 103 positions and VV holds 434; 11 of QQQM's positions don't appear in VV at all, and they are 4.4% of QQQM by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares QQQM and VV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch QQQM vs VV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, QQQM as of 2026-02-28, VV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.