RGAGX vs TSPI: 7% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and TSP I Fund — shown via international proxy share 7.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
7.3%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%
TSPI expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

RGAGX and TSPI hold 50 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin RGAGXin TSPIΔ
23302.3%4.3%2.0%
ASML0.8%1.7%0.9%
0006600.8%2.2%1.4%
SHOP1.2%0.3%0.9%
RR-0.3%0.4%0.1%
SAP0.3%0.4%0.1%
0059300.2%2.3%2.0%
99840.2%0.3%0.1%
BN0.2%0.3%0.1%
60980.2%0.2%0.0%

Where RGAGX and TSPI differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorRGAGXTSPIΔ
Financials6.5%19.7%13.1pp
Communication Services13.2%3.3%+10.0pp
Information Technology30.6%20.9%+9.7pp
Health Care11.0%5.3%+5.7pp
Consumer Discretionary12.7%7.5%+5.2pp
Industrials9.8%13.8%4.0pp
Materials1.5%5.2%3.7pp
Utilities0.5%3.0%2.5pp

Δ is RGAGX minus TSPI, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in RGAGX
258 positions

88.1% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of TSPI.

Only in TSPI
8,403 positions

84.4% of TSPI by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

RGAGXTSPI
Top 10 holdings36.7%16.3%
Positions held3098,453
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$30$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do RGAGX and TSPI overlap?

RGAGX and TSPI overlap 7.3% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 50 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPI as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between RGAGX and TSPI calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and TSPI holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and TSPI?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 7.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does RGAGX own that TSPI doesn't?

RGAGX holds 309 positions and TSPI holds 8,453; 258 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in TSPI at all, and they are 88.1% of RGAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares RGAGX and TSPI. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch RGAGX vs TSPI

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPI as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.