RGAGX vs TSPS: 7% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and TSP S Fund — shown via extended-market proxy share 7.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
7.4%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%
TSPS expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

RGAGX and TSPS hold 75 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin RGAGXin TSPSΔ
NET0.9%0.9%0.0%
ALNY0.8%0.5%0.4%
RBLX0.4%0.4%0.1%
MSTR0.9%0.3%0.6%
FTAI0.6%0.3%0.3%
ATI0.4%0.3%0.1%
AFRM0.3%0.3%0.1%
FTI0.2%0.3%0.1%
LPLA0.2%0.3%0.0%
BURL0.4%0.2%0.2%

Where RGAGX and TSPS differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorRGAGXTSPSΔ
Information Technology30.6%17.6%+12.9pp
Industrials9.8%19.8%10.0pp
Communication Services13.2%4.5%+8.8pp
Financials6.5%13.9%7.4pp
Unclassified7.6%1.0%+6.6pp
Real Estate0.6%4.8%4.2pp
Consumer Discretionary12.7%8.8%+3.9pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.0%3.8%3.8pp

Δ is RGAGX minus TSPS, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in RGAGX
233 positions

89.6% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of TSPS.

Only in TSPS
3,252 positions

86.9% of TSPS by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

RGAGXTSPS
Top 10 holdings36.7%10.6%
Positions held3093,327
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$30$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do RGAGX and TSPS overlap?

RGAGX and TSPS overlap 7.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 75 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPS as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between RGAGX and TSPS calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and TSPS holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and TSPS?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 7.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does RGAGX own that TSPS doesn't?

RGAGX holds 309 positions and TSPS holds 3,327; 233 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in TSPS at all, and they are 89.6% of RGAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares RGAGX and TSPS. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch RGAGX vs TSPS

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPS as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.