RGAGX vs VB: 6% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 5.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
5.9%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%
VB expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

RGAGX and VB hold 79 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin RGAGXin VBΔ
FTAI0.6%0.3%0.2%
ATI0.4%0.3%0.0%
AFRM0.3%0.3%0.1%
FTI0.2%0.3%0.1%
XPO0.2%0.3%0.1%
MRNA0.2%0.3%0.1%
ALB0.2%0.2%0.0%
STLD0.2%0.2%0.0%
TOST0.2%0.2%0.0%
IONS0.2%0.1%0.0%

Where RGAGX and VB differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorRGAGXVBΔ
Information Technology30.6%16.1%+14.5pp
Industrials9.8%21.0%11.2pp
Communication Services13.2%3.0%+10.2pp
Unclassified7.6%0.6%+7.0pp
Real Estate0.6%7.1%6.5pp
Financials6.5%12.7%6.2pp
Materials1.5%5.3%3.8pp
Utilities0.5%3.3%2.8pp

Δ is RGAGX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in RGAGX
229 positions

91.6% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of VB.

Only in VB
1,229 positions

88.0% of VB by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

RGAGXVB
Top 10 holdings36.7%5.6%
Positions held3091,308
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$30$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do RGAGX and VB overlap?

RGAGX and VB overlap 5.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 79 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between RGAGX and VB calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and VB?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 5.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does RGAGX own that VB doesn't?

RGAGX holds 309 positions and VB holds 1,308; 229 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 91.6% of RGAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares RGAGX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch RGAGX vs VB

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.