RGAGX vs VONG: 48% overlap
American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF share 48.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
RGAGX and VONG hold 129 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in RGAGX | in VONG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 6.1% | 13.8% | 7.8% |
| AVGO | 4.3% | 5.2% | 0.9% |
| MSFT | 4.0% | 4.1% | 0.1% |
| META | 4.2% | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| GOOG | 2.9% | 5.0% | 2.0% |
| GOOGL | 2.9% | 6.2% | 3.3% |
| LLY | 3.3% | 2.8% | 0.5% |
| TSLA | 2.6% | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| AAPL | 1.8% | 6.7% | 4.9% |
| MU | 1.8% | 3.9% | 2.1% |
Where RGAGX and VONG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | RGAGX | VONG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.6% | 54.3% | −23.7pp |
| Unclassified | 7.6% | 0.0% | +7.6pp |
| Health Care | 11.0% | 5.4% | +5.6pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.7% | 8.2% | +4.5pp |
| Communication Services | 13.2% | 16.1% | −2.9pp |
| Financials | 6.5% | 4.3% | +2.3pp |
| Energy | 1.9% | 0.4% | +1.5pp |
| Materials | 1.5% | 0.3% | +1.3pp |
Δ is RGAGX minus VONG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
33.2% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of VONG.
14.1% of VONG by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| RGAGX | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 36.7% | 54.3% |
| Positions held | 309 | 370 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $30 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do RGAGX and VONG overlap?
RGAGX and VONG overlap 48.2% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 129 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VONG as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between RGAGX and VONG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and VONG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and VONG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 48.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does RGAGX own that VONG doesn't?
RGAGX holds 309 positions and VONG holds 370; 179 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in VONG at all, and they are 33.2% of RGAGX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares RGAGX and VONG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch RGAGX vs VONG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VONG as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.