RGAGX vs VTTHX: 27% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 share 27.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.7Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
27.3%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%
VTTHX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

RGAGX and VTTHX hold 273 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin RGAGXin VTTHXΔ
NVDA6.1%2.5%3.6%
AAPL1.8%2.3%0.5%
MSFT4.0%1.5%2.5%
AMZN2.9%1.2%1.6%
23302.3%1.2%1.1%
GOOGL2.9%1.1%1.8%
AVGO4.3%1.0%3.3%
GOOG2.9%0.9%2.0%
MU1.8%0.7%1.1%
META4.2%0.7%3.6%

Where RGAGX and VTTHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorRGAGXVTTHXΔ
Treasuries0.0%11.2%11.2pp
Information Technology30.6%19.5%+11.0pp
Communication Services13.2%4.5%+8.8pp
Consumer Discretionary12.7%5.7%+7.0pp
Health Care11.0%5.2%+5.8pp
Financials6.5%12.0%5.5pp
MBS Pass-Through0.5%4.7%4.2pp
Unclassified7.6%11.2%3.6pp

Δ is RGAGX minus VTTHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in RGAGX
35 positions

6.3% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of VTTHX.

Only in VTTHX
16,409 positions

64.3% of VTTHX by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

RGAGXVTTHX
Top 10 holdings36.7%26.4%
Positions held3096
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$30$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do RGAGX and VTTHX overlap?

RGAGX and VTTHX overlap 27.3% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 273 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between RGAGX and VTTHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and VTTHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and VTTHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 27.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does RGAGX own that VTTHX doesn't?

RGAGX holds 309 positions and VTTHX holds 6; 35 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in VTTHX at all, and they are 6.3% of RGAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares RGAGX and VTTHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch RGAGX vs VTTHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.