RGAGX vs XLE: 2% overlap

American Funds Growth Fund of America R6 and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund share 1.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.6%
RGAGX expense ratio
0.30%
XLE expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

RGAGX and XLE hold 9 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin RGAGXin XLEΔ
EOG0.4%4.5%4.1%
HAL0.3%1.7%1.4%
XOM0.3%20.8%20.5%
COP0.2%6.1%5.9%
EXE0.1%1.4%1.2%
EQT0.1%2.1%2.0%
FANG0.1%2.5%2.4%
CVX0.1%15.1%15.1%
SLB0.0%4.1%4.1%

Where RGAGX and XLE differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorRGAGXXLEΔ
Energy1.9%99.8%97.9pp
Information Technology30.6%0.0%+30.6pp
Communication Services13.2%0.0%+13.2pp
Consumer Discretionary12.7%0.0%+12.7pp
Health Care11.0%0.0%+11.0pp
Industrials9.8%0.0%+9.8pp
Unclassified7.6%0.0%+7.6pp
Financials6.5%0.0%+6.5pp

Δ is RGAGX minus XLE, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in RGAGX
299 positions

97.2% of RGAGX by weight, held in no part of XLE.

Only in XLE
13 positions

41.7% of XLE by weight, held in no part of RGAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

RGAGXXLE
Top 10 holdings36.7%73.1%
Positions held30923
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$30$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do RGAGX and XLE overlap?

RGAGX and XLE overlap 1.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 9 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, XLE as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between RGAGX and XLE calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If RGAGX holds a stock at 6% and XLE holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both RGAGX and XLE?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does RGAGX own that XLE doesn't?

RGAGX holds 309 positions and XLE holds 23; 299 of RGAGX's positions don't appear in XLE at all, and they are 97.2% of RGAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares RGAGX and XLE. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch RGAGX vs XLE

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, RGAGX as of 2026-02-28, XLE as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.