SCHB vs VIMAX: 15% overlap
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Admiral share 14.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 30 days apart — SCHB as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SCHB and VIMAX hold 262 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SCHB | in VIMAX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| WDC | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| CASH | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| VRT | 0.2% | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| NEM | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| PWR | 0.1% | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| HWM | 0.1% | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| CEG | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| CMI | 0.1% | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| FDX | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| SNOW | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Where SCHB and VIMAX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SCHB | VIMAX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 35.8% | 16.1% | +19.7pp |
| Industrials | 8.8% | 19.6% | −10.8pp |
| Communication Services | 9.6% | 2.8% | +6.8pp |
| Utilities | 2.1% | 8.4% | −6.3pp |
| Energy | 3.2% | 7.3% | −4.1pp |
| Unclassified | 3.5% | 0.4% | +3.1pp |
| Real Estate | 2.2% | 5.1% | −2.9pp |
| Financials | 11.1% | 14.0% | −2.9pp |
Δ is SCHB minus VIMAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
85.4% of SCHB by weight, held in no part of VIMAX.
7.1% of VIMAX by weight, held in no part of SCHB.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SCHB | VIMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 34.9% | 9.5% |
| Positions held | 2,407 | 283 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $5 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SCHB and VIMAX overlap?
SCHB and VIMAX overlap 14.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 262 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHB as of 2026-05-31, VIMAX as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between SCHB and VIMAX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHB holds a stock at 6% and VIMAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SCHB and VIMAX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 14.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SCHB own that VIMAX doesn't?
SCHB holds 2,407 positions and VIMAX holds 283; 2,144 of SCHB's positions don't appear in VIMAX at all, and they are 85.4% of SCHB by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SCHB and VIMAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SCHB vs VIMAX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHB as of 2026-05-31, VIMAX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.