SCHF vs SCHX: 0% overlap
Schwab International Equity ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF share 0.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SCHF and SCHX hold 3 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SCHF | in SCHX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| CH1430134226 | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| RBA | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where SCHF and SCHX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SCHF | SCHX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 95.9% | 3.4% | +92.5pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 36.8% | −36.8pp |
| Communication Services | 0.2% | 10.1% | −9.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 9.4% | −9.2pp |
| Financials | 1.9% | 10.9% | −9.0pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 8.1% | −8.1pp |
| Industrials | 0.3% | 8.2% | −7.9pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.5% | 4.4% | −4.0pp |
Δ is SCHF minus SCHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.2% of SCHF by weight, held in no part of SCHX.
99.8% of SCHX by weight, held in no part of SCHF.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SCHF | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 14.8% | 37.3% |
| Positions held | 1,477 | 750 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SCHF and SCHX overlap?
SCHF and SCHX overlap 0.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 3 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHF as of 2026-05-31, SCHX as of 2026-05-31).
How is the overlap between SCHF and SCHX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHF holds a stock at 6% and SCHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SCHF and SCHX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SCHF own that SCHX doesn't?
SCHF holds 1,477 positions and SCHX holds 750; 1,473 of SCHF's positions don't appear in SCHX at all, and they are 99.2% of SCHF by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SCHF and SCHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SCHF vs SCHX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHF as of 2026-05-31, SCHX as of 2026-05-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.