SCHG vs VBIAX: 2% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Balanced Index Admiral share 1.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — VBIAX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-05-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.5%
SCHG expense ratio
0.04%
VBIAX expense ratio
0.07%

Top shared holdings

SCHG and VBIAX hold 17 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHGin VBIAXΔ
LLY3.1%0.7%2.3%
TMO0.6%0.2%0.5%
DIS0.6%0.2%0.5%
MCK0.3%0.1%0.2%
CEG0.3%0.1%0.2%
NET0.3%0.1%0.2%
CASH0.1%1.8%1.7%
LPLA0.1%0.0%0.1%
ULTA0.1%0.0%0.1%
MTZ0.1%0.0%0.1%

Where SCHG and VBIAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHGVBIAXΔ
Unclassified1.9%55.1%53.2pp
Information Technology46.1%1.0%+45.1pp
Treasuries0.0%19.1%19.1pp
Communication Services14.7%0.5%+14.2pp
Consumer Discretionary12.1%0.5%+11.6pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%8.1%8.1pp
Health Care8.3%1.2%+7.2pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%5.8%5.8pp

Δ is SCHG minus VBIAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHG
177 positions

94.0% of SCHG by weight, held in no part of VBIAX.

Only in VBIAX
5,101 positions

97.6% of VBIAX by weight, held in no part of SCHG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHGVBIAX
Top 10 holdings57.2%45.2%
Positions held1955,119
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$7

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHG and VBIAX overlap?

SCHG and VBIAX overlap 1.5% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 17 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VBIAX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between SCHG and VBIAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHG holds a stock at 6% and VBIAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHG and VBIAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHG own that VBIAX doesn't?

SCHG holds 195 positions and VBIAX holds 5,119; 177 of SCHG's positions don't appear in VBIAX at all, and they are 94.0% of SCHG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHG and VBIAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHG vs VBIAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VBIAX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.