SCHG vs VFORX: 21% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 share 21.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VFORX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
21.0%
SCHG expense ratio
0.04%
VFORX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SCHG and VFORX hold 184 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHGin VFORXΔ
NVDA11.0%2.8%8.3%
AAPL9.8%2.5%7.3%
MSFT7.2%1.7%5.5%
AMZN5.7%1.4%4.3%
GOOGL4.8%1.3%3.5%
AVGO4.5%1.1%3.5%
GOOG3.8%1.0%2.8%
META3.5%0.7%2.7%
TSLA3.9%0.7%3.2%
LLY3.1%0.6%2.4%

Where SCHG and VFORX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHGVFORXΔ
Information Technology46.1%21.6%+24.4pp
Communication Services14.7%4.9%+9.8pp
Treasuries0.0%8.7%8.7pp
Unclassified1.9%9.7%7.8pp
Financials6.8%12.7%5.9pp
Consumer Discretionary12.1%6.3%+5.9pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%3.7%3.7pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%2.8%2.8pp

Δ is SCHG minus VFORX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHG
10 positions

1.9% of SCHG by weight, held in no part of VFORX.

Only in VFORX
16,498 positions

77.0% of VFORX by weight, held in no part of SCHG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHGVFORX
Top 10 holdings57.2%23.9%
Positions held1956
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHG and VFORX overlap?

SCHG and VFORX overlap 21.0% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 184 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VFORX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between SCHG and VFORX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHG holds a stock at 6% and VFORX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHG and VFORX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 21.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHG own that VFORX doesn't?

SCHG holds 195 positions and VFORX holds 6; 10 of SCHG's positions don't appear in VFORX at all, and they are 1.9% of SCHG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHG and VFORX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHG vs VFORX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VFORX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.