SCHG vs VTTHX: 19% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 share 19.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTTHX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
19.0%
SCHG expense ratio
0.04%
VTTHX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SCHG and VTTHX hold 184 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHGin VTTHXΔ
NVDA11.0%2.5%8.5%
AAPL9.8%2.3%7.5%
MSFT7.2%1.5%5.7%
AMZN5.7%1.2%4.4%
GOOGL4.8%1.1%3.6%
AVGO4.5%1.0%3.6%
GOOG3.8%0.9%2.9%
META3.5%0.7%2.8%
TSLA3.9%0.6%3.3%
LLY3.1%0.5%2.5%

Where SCHG and VTTHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHGVTTHXΔ
Information Technology46.1%19.5%+26.6pp
Treasuries0.0%11.2%11.2pp
Communication Services14.7%4.5%+10.3pp
Unclassified1.9%11.2%9.3pp
Consumer Discretionary12.1%5.7%+6.5pp
Financials6.8%12.0%5.3pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%4.7%4.7pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%3.6%3.6pp

Δ is SCHG minus VTTHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHG
10 positions

1.9% of SCHG by weight, held in no part of VTTHX.

Only in VTTHX
16,498 positions

79.0% of VTTHX by weight, held in no part of SCHG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHGVTTHX
Top 10 holdings57.2%26.4%
Positions held1956
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHG and VTTHX overlap?

SCHG and VTTHX overlap 19.0% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 184 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between SCHG and VTTHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHG holds a stock at 6% and VTTHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHG and VTTHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 19.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHG own that VTTHX doesn't?

SCHG holds 195 positions and VTTHX holds 6; 10 of SCHG's positions don't appear in VTTHX at all, and they are 1.9% of SCHG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHG and VTTHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHG vs VTTHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.