SCHX vs XLF: 10% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund share 10.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — SCHX as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.9Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
10.4%
SCHX expense ratio
0.03%
XLF expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SCHX and XLF hold 70 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHXin XLFΔ
BRK-B1.3%11.4%10.1%
JPM1.2%11.9%10.7%
V0.8%7.4%6.6%
MA0.6%5.4%4.8%
BAC0.5%5.1%4.6%
GS0.4%4.0%3.6%
MS0.4%3.3%2.9%
WFC0.4%3.3%3.0%
C0.3%2.9%2.5%
AXP0.2%2.3%2.1%

Where SCHX and XLF differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHXXLFΔ
Financials10.9%99.9%88.9pp
Information Technology36.8%0.0%+36.8pp
Communication Services10.1%0.0%+10.1pp
Consumer Discretionary9.4%0.0%+9.4pp
Industrials8.2%0.0%+8.2pp
Health Care8.1%0.0%+8.1pp
Consumer Staples4.4%0.0%+4.4pp
Unclassified3.4%0.0%+3.4pp

Δ is SCHX minus XLF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHX
679 positions

89.5% of SCHX by weight, held in no part of XLF.

Only in XLF
7 positions

4.0% of XLF by weight, held in no part of SCHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHXXLF
Top 10 holdings37.3%57.0%
Positions held75078
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHX and XLF overlap?

SCHX and XLF overlap 10.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 70 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHX as of 2026-05-31, XLF as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between SCHX and XLF calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHX holds a stock at 6% and XLF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHX and XLF?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 10.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHX own that XLF doesn't?

SCHX holds 750 positions and XLF holds 78; 679 of SCHX's positions don't appear in XLF at all, and they are 89.5% of SCHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHX and XLF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHX vs XLF

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHX as of 2026-05-31, XLF as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.