SCHX vs XLK: 36% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund share 35.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — SCHX as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.6Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.6. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
35.8%
SCHX expense ratio
0.03%
XLK expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SCHX and XLK hold 68 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHXin XLKΔ
NVDA7.5%14.1%6.6%
AAPL6.7%13.2%6.5%
MSFT4.9%7.9%3.0%
AVGO3.1%5.2%2.1%
MU1.6%4.3%2.7%
AMD1.2%4.7%3.4%
INTC0.8%3.2%2.4%
CSCO0.7%3.0%2.3%
LRCX0.6%2.7%2.1%
ORCL0.6%1.4%0.8%

Where SCHX and XLK differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHXXLKΔ
Information Technology36.8%99.9%63.2pp
Financials10.9%0.0%+10.9pp
Communication Services10.1%0.0%+10.1pp
Consumer Discretionary9.4%0.0%+9.4pp
Industrials8.2%0.0%+8.2pp
Health Care8.1%0.0%+8.1pp
Consumer Staples4.4%0.0%+4.4pp
Unclassified3.4%0.0%+3.4pp

Δ is SCHX minus XLK, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHX
681 positions

64.1% of SCHX by weight, held in no part of XLK.

Only in XLK
7 positions

5.2% of XLK by weight, held in no part of SCHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHXXLK
Top 10 holdings37.3%61.3%
Positions held75076
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHX and XLK overlap?

SCHX and XLK overlap 35.8% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 68 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHX as of 2026-05-31, XLK as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between SCHX and XLK calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHX holds a stock at 6% and XLK holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHX and XLK?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 35.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHX own that XLK doesn't?

SCHX holds 750 positions and XLK holds 76; 681 of SCHX's positions don't appear in XLK at all, and they are 64.1% of SCHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHX and XLK. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHX vs XLK

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHX as of 2026-05-31, XLK as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.