SMH vs VONG: 33% overlap
VanEck Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF share 32.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — SMH as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SMH and VONG hold 16 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SMH | in VONG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 19.6% | 13.8% | 5.8% |
| AVGO | 7.8% | 5.2% | 2.6% |
| MU | 4.2% | 3.9% | 0.4% |
| AMD | 4.7% | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| AMAT | 4.6% | 1.7% | 2.9% |
| LRCX | 4.6% | 1.6% | 3.0% |
| KLAC | 4.7% | 1.2% | 3.6% |
| TXN | 4.6% | 0.8% | 3.8% |
| MRVL | 2.4% | 0.8% | 1.6% |
| CDNS | 2.4% | 0.3% | 2.1% |
Where SMH and VONG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SMH | VONG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 92.8% | 54.3% | +38.6pp |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 16.1% | −16.1pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 8.8% | −8.8pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.2% | −8.2pp |
| Unclassified | 7.2% | 0.0% | +7.2pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 5.4% | −5.4pp |
| Financials | 0.0% | 4.3% | −4.3pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 1.3% | −1.3pp |
Δ is SMH minus VONG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
30.9% of SMH by weight, held in no part of VONG.
67.1% of VONG by weight, held in no part of SMH.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SMH | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 72.2% | 54.3% |
| Positions held | 26 | 370 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $35 | $6 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SMH and VONG overlap?
SMH and VONG overlap 32.9% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 16 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SMH as of 2026-03-31, VONG as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between SMH and VONG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SMH holds a stock at 6% and VONG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SMH and VONG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 32.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SMH own that VONG doesn't?
SMH holds 26 positions and VONG holds 370; 10 of SMH's positions don't appear in VONG at all, and they are 30.9% of SMH by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SMH and VONG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SMH vs VONG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SMH as of 2026-03-31, VONG as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.