SOXX vs VTIVX: 9% overlap
iShares Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 share 8.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SOXX and VTIVX hold 28 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SOXX | in VTIVX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 8.3% | 3.0% | 5.2% |
| AVGO | 7.3% | 1.2% | 6.2% |
| MU | 8.5% | 0.9% | 7.7% |
| AMD | 8.7% | 0.6% | 8.1% |
| ASML | 2.4% | 0.6% | 1.9% |
| AMAT | 5.2% | 0.4% | 4.8% |
| INTC | 5.3% | 0.4% | 4.9% |
| LRCX | 4.2% | 0.4% | 3.8% |
| KLAC | 4.8% | 0.3% | 4.5% |
| TXN | 3.9% | 0.2% | 3.7% |
Where SOXX and VTIVX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SOXX | VTIVX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.9% | 23.8% | +76.1pp |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.3% | −13.3pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.6% | −9.6pp |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 8.0% | −8.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 6.9% | −6.9pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 6.3% | −6.3pp |
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 6.2% | −6.2pp |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 5.4% | −5.4pp |
Δ is SOXX minus VTIVX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
8.7% of SOXX by weight, held in no part of VTIVX.
89.5% of VTIVX by weight, held in no part of SOXX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SOXX | VTIVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 60.9% | 21.4% |
| Positions held | 32 | 6 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $34 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SOXX and VTIVX overlap?
SOXX and VTIVX overlap 8.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 28 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SOXX as of 2026-07-23, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between SOXX and VTIVX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SOXX holds a stock at 6% and VTIVX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SOXX and VTIVX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 8.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SOXX own that VTIVX doesn't?
SOXX holds 32 positions and VTIVX holds 6; 3 of SOXX's positions don't appear in VTIVX at all, and they are 8.7% of SOXX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SOXX and VTIVX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SOXX vs VTIVX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SOXX as of 2026-07-23, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.