SWISX vs XLF: 0% overlap
Schwab International Index and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund share 0.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — SWISX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SWISX and XLF hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SWISX | in XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.5% |
Where SWISX and XLF differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SWISX | XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 0.0% | 99.9% | −99.9pp |
| Unclassified | 99.1% | 0.0% | +99.1pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 0.6% | 0.1% | +0.5pp |
| Cash & Other | 0.0% | -0.1% | +0.1pp |
Δ is SWISX minus XLF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.1% of SWISX by weight, held in no part of XLF.
99.9% of XLF by weight, held in no part of SWISX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SWISX | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 13.3% | 57.0% |
| Positions held | 694 | 78 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SWISX and XLF overlap?
SWISX and XLF overlap 0.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWISX as of 2026-04-30, XLF as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between SWISX and XLF calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWISX holds a stock at 6% and XLF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SWISX and XLF?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SWISX own that XLF doesn't?
SWISX holds 694 positions and XLF holds 78; 692 of SWISX's positions don't appear in XLF at all, and they are 99.1% of SWISX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SWISX and XLF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SWISX vs XLF
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SWISX as of 2026-04-30, XLF as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.