TRRBX vs VGSLX: 0% overlap

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 and Vanguard Real Estate Index Admiral share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.0%
TRRBX expense ratio
0.53%
VGSLX expense ratio
0.13%

Top shared holdings

TRRBX and VGSLX hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin TRRBXin VGSLXΔ

Where TRRBX and VGSLX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorTRRBXVGSLXΔ
Unclassified99.9%14.7%+85.2pp
Real Estate0.0%84.0%84.0pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.0%0.6%0.6pp
Financials0.0%0.3%0.3pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%0.2%0.2pp
Consumer Staples0.0%0.2%0.2pp
Industrials0.0%0.0%0.0pp

Δ is TRRBX minus VGSLX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in TRRBX
31 positions

99.9% of TRRBX by weight, held in no part of VGSLX.

Only in VGSLX
145 positions

100.0% of VGSLX by weight, held in no part of TRRBX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

TRRBXVGSLX
Top 10 holdings69.2%54.1%
Positions held31145
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$53$13

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do TRRBX and VGSLX overlap?

TRRBX and VGSLX overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, VGSLX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between TRRBX and VGSLX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If TRRBX holds a stock at 6% and VGSLX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both TRRBX and VGSLX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does TRRBX own that VGSLX doesn't?

TRRBX holds 31 positions and VGSLX holds 145; 31 of TRRBX's positions don't appear in VGSLX at all, and they are 99.9% of TRRBX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares TRRBX and VGSLX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch TRRBX vs VGSLX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, VGSLX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.