TRRBX vs XLV: 0% overlap
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
TRRBX and XLV hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in TRRBX | in XLV | Δ |
|---|
Where TRRBX and XLV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | TRRBX | XLV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 99.9% | 0.0% | +99.9pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 99.7% | −99.7pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 0.0% | 0.1% | −0.1pp |
| Cash & Other | 0.0% | 0.0% | −0.0pp |
Δ is TRRBX minus XLV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.9% of TRRBX by weight, held in no part of XLV.
99.8% of XLV by weight, held in no part of TRRBX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| TRRBX | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 69.2% | 62.0% |
| Positions held | 31 | 62 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $53 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do TRRBX and XLV overlap?
TRRBX and XLV overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, XLV as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between TRRBX and XLV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If TRRBX holds a stock at 6% and XLV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both TRRBX and XLV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does TRRBX own that XLV doesn't?
TRRBX holds 31 positions and XLV holds 62; 31 of TRRBX's positions don't appear in XLV at all, and they are 99.9% of TRRBX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares TRRBX and XLV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch TRRBX vs XLV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, TRRBX as of 2026-02-28, XLV as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.