TSPC vs VFMO: 23% overlap
TSP C Fund — shown via S&P 500 proxy and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF share 22.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VFMO as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
TSPC and VFMO hold 131 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in TSPC | in VFMO | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| JNJ | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| GOOGL | 3.2% | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| AMAT | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| LRCX | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| MU | 2.0% | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| INTC | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.3% |
| CAT | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| AVGO | 2.8% | 0.6% | 2.2% |
| KLAC | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.4% |
Where TSPC and VFMO differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | TSPC | VFMO | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.0% | 17.0% | +21.0pp |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 24.4% | −15.5pp |
| Health Care | 8.9% | 22.3% | −13.4pp |
| Communication Services | 9.7% | 3.4% | +6.3pp |
| Financials | 11.6% | 6.3% | +5.3pp |
| Energy | 3.0% | 7.7% | −4.7pp |
| Materials | 1.8% | 6.2% | −4.4pp |
| Utilities | 2.2% | 0.0% | +2.2pp |
Δ is TSPC minus VFMO, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
61.6% of TSPC by weight, held in no part of VFMO.
56.5% of VFMO by weight, held in no part of TSPC.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| TSPC | VFMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 36.4% | 10.2% |
| Positions held | 505 | 672 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $5 | $13 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do TSPC and VFMO overlap?
TSPC and VFMO overlap 22.9% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 131 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (TSPC as of 2026-06-30, VFMO as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between TSPC and VFMO calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If TSPC holds a stock at 6% and VFMO holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both TSPC and VFMO?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 22.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does TSPC own that VFMO doesn't?
TSPC holds 505 positions and VFMO holds 672; 374 of TSPC's positions don't appear in VFMO at all, and they are 61.6% of TSPC by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares TSPC and VFMO. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch TSPC vs VFMO
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, TSPC as of 2026-06-30, VFMO as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.