VFFVX vs VFORX: 84% overlap

Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 and Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 share 84.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VFFVX, VFORX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.2Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.2. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
84.2%
VFFVX expense ratio
0.08%
VFORX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

VFFVX and VFORX hold 16,682 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin VFFVXin VFORXΔ
NVDA3.3%2.8%0.6%
AAPL3.1%2.5%0.5%
CASH1.9%1.8%0.1%
MSFT2.0%1.7%0.3%
UST-3-10Y1.4%3.8%2.4%
AGENCY-MBS1.4%3.7%2.3%
AMZN1.7%1.4%0.3%
23301.6%1.3%0.3%
GOOGL1.5%1.3%0.3%
UST-0-3Y1.1%3.0%1.9%

Where VFFVX and VFORX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorVFFVXVFORXΔ
Treasuries3.3%8.7%5.4pp
Information Technology26.3%21.6%+4.6pp
Unclassified6.1%9.7%3.5pp
MBS Pass-Through1.4%3.7%2.3pp
Industrials10.6%8.7%+1.9pp
Corporate — industrial & other1.1%2.8%1.7pp
Financials14.1%12.7%+1.4pp
Consumer Discretionary7.6%6.3%+1.3pp

Δ is VFFVX minus VFORX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in VFFVX
0 positions

0.0% of VFFVX by weight, held in no part of VFORX.

Only in VFORX
0 positions

0.0% of VFORX by weight, held in no part of VFFVX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

VFFVXVFORX
Top 10 holdings19.2%23.9%
Positions held66
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$8$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do VFFVX and VFORX overlap?

VFFVX and VFORX overlap 84.2% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 16,682 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VFFVX as of 2026-03-31, VFORX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between VFFVX and VFORX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VFFVX holds a stock at 6% and VFORX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both VFFVX and VFORX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 84.2% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: VFFVX 0.08% versus VFORX 0.08%.

What does VFFVX own that VFORX doesn't?

VFFVX holds 6 positions and VFORX holds 6; 0 of VFFVX's positions don't appear in VFORX at all, and they are 0.0% of VFFVX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares VFFVX and VFORX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch VFFVX vs VFORX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, VFFVX as of 2026-03-31, VFORX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.