VFMO vs XLF: 3% overlap
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund share 2.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VFMO as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-27. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VFMO and XLF hold 16 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VFMO | in XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| USB | 0.4% | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| MS | 0.4% | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| C | 0.3% | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| PNC | 0.3% | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| JPM | 0.2% | 11.9% | 11.6% |
| SYF | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| GL | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| IVZ | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| GS | 0.2% | 3.8% | 3.7% |
| BEN | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Where VFMO and XLF differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VFMO | XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 6.3% | 99.9% | −93.6pp |
| Industrials | 24.4% | 0.0% | +24.4pp |
| Health Care | 22.3% | 0.0% | +22.3pp |
| Information Technology | 17.0% | 0.0% | +17.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.8% | 0.0% | +7.8pp |
| Energy | 7.7% | 0.0% | +7.7pp |
| Materials | 6.2% | 0.0% | +6.2pp |
| Communication Services | 3.4% | 0.0% | +3.4pp |
Δ is VFMO minus XLF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
95.7% of VFMO by weight, held in no part of XLF.
72.6% of XLF by weight, held in no part of VFMO.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VFMO | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 10.2% | 56.7% |
| Positions held | 672 | 78 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $13 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VFMO and XLF overlap?
VFMO and XLF overlap 2.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 16 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VFMO as of 2026-03-31, XLF as of 2026-07-27).
How is the overlap between VFMO and XLF calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VFMO holds a stock at 6% and XLF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VFMO and XLF?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VFMO own that XLF doesn't?
VFMO holds 672 positions and XLF holds 78; 656 of VFMO's positions don't appear in XLF at all, and they are 95.7% of VFMO by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VFMO and XLF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VFMO vs XLF
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VFMO as of 2026-03-31, XLF as of 2026-07-27. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.