VFORX vs VLXVX: 84% overlap

Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 and Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 share 84.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VFORX, VLXVX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.2Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.2. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
84.2%
VFORX expense ratio
0.08%
VLXVX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

VFORX and VLXVX hold 16,682 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin VFORXin VLXVXΔ
NVDA2.8%3.3%0.6%
AAPL2.5%3.1%0.5%
CASH1.8%2.0%0.2%
MSFT1.7%2.0%0.3%
UST-3-10Y3.8%1.4%2.4%
AMZN1.4%1.7%0.3%
AGENCY-MBS3.7%1.4%2.3%
23301.3%1.6%0.3%
GOOGL1.3%1.5%0.3%
UST-0-3Y3.0%1.1%1.9%

Where VFORX and VLXVX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorVFORXVLXVXΔ
Treasuries8.7%3.3%+5.5pp
Information Technology21.6%26.3%4.6pp
Unclassified9.7%6.1%+3.6pp
MBS Pass-Through3.7%1.4%+2.3pp
Industrials8.7%10.6%1.9pp
Corporate — industrial & other2.8%1.1%+1.8pp
Financials12.7%14.1%1.4pp
Consumer Discretionary6.3%7.6%1.3pp

Δ is VFORX minus VLXVX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in VFORX
0 positions

0.0% of VFORX by weight, held in no part of VLXVX.

Only in VLXVX
0 positions

0.0% of VLXVX by weight, held in no part of VFORX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

VFORXVLXVX
Top 10 holdings23.9%19.3%
Positions held66
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$8$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do VFORX and VLXVX overlap?

VFORX and VLXVX overlap 84.2% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 16,682 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VFORX as of 2026-03-31, VLXVX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between VFORX and VLXVX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VFORX holds a stock at 6% and VLXVX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both VFORX and VLXVX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 84.2% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: VFORX 0.08% versus VLXVX 0.08%.

What does VFORX own that VLXVX doesn't?

VFORX holds 6 positions and VLXVX holds 6; 0 of VFORX's positions don't appear in VLXVX at all, and they are 0.0% of VFORX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares VFORX and VLXVX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch VFORX vs VLXVX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, VFORX as of 2026-03-31, VLXVX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.