VFORX vs XLC: 4% overlap
Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund share 3.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VFORX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VFORX and XLC hold 24 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VFORX | in XLC | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 1.3% | 10.1% | 8.8% |
| GOOG | 1.0% | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| META | 0.7% | 18.5% | 17.8% |
| NFLX | 0.2% | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| CASH | 1.8% | 0.2% | 1.7% |
| DIS | 0.1% | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| VZ | 0.1% | 4.6% | 4.5% |
| T | 0.1% | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| CMCSA | 0.1% | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| TMUS | 0.0% | 4.5% | 4.5% |
Where VFORX and XLC differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VFORX | XLC | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 4.9% | 99.8% | −94.9pp |
| Information Technology | 21.6% | 0.0% | +21.6pp |
| Financials | 12.7% | 0.0% | +12.7pp |
| Unclassified | 9.7% | 0.0% | +9.7pp |
| Treasuries | 8.7% | 0.0% | +8.7pp |
| Industrials | 8.7% | 0.0% | +8.7pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.3% | 0.0% | +6.3pp |
| Health Care | 5.8% | 0.0% | +5.8pp |
Δ is VFORX minus XLC, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
94.4% of VFORX by weight, held in no part of XLC.
0.0% of XLC by weight, held in no part of VFORX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VFORX | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 23.9% | 68.6% |
| Positions held | 6 | 25 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $8 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VFORX and XLC overlap?
VFORX and XLC overlap 3.9% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 24 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VFORX as of 2026-03-31, XLC as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between VFORX and XLC calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VFORX holds a stock at 6% and XLC holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VFORX and XLC?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 3.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VFORX own that XLC doesn't?
VFORX holds 6 positions and XLC holds 25; 16,658 of VFORX's positions don't appear in XLC at all, and they are 94.4% of VFORX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VFORX and XLC. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VFORX vs XLC
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VFORX as of 2026-03-31, XLC as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.