VGT vs VV: 38% overlap
Vanguard Information Technology ETF and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF share 38.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.6. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VGT and VV hold 72 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VGT | in VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 16.1% | 7.3% | 8.8% |
| AAPL | 14.3% | 6.7% | 7.6% |
| MSFT | 8.3% | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| AVGO | 3.8% | 2.8% | 1.0% |
| MU | 5.0% | 2.1% | 3.0% |
| AMD | 3.6% | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| AMAT | 2.3% | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| INTC | 2.4% | 0.9% | 1.5% |
| LRCX | 2.1% | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| CSCO | 1.8% | 0.7% | 1.2% |
Where VGT and VV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VGT | VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.5% | 38.1% | +61.3pp |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.6% | −11.5pp |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 10.0% | −10.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.1% | −9.1pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.0% | −9.0pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 8.9% | −8.9pp |
| Consumer Staples | 0.1% | 4.5% | −4.4pp |
| Energy | 0.0% | 3.0% | −3.0pp |
Δ is VGT minus VV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
12.6% of VGT by weight, held in no part of VV.
61.4% of VV by weight, held in no part of VGT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VGT | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 59.9% | 36.6% |
| Positions held | 322 | 434 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $9 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VGT and VV overlap?
VGT and VV overlap 38.5% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 72 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VGT as of 2026-06-30, VV as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between VGT and VV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VGT holds a stock at 6% and VV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VGT and VV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 38.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VGT own that VV doesn't?
VGT holds 322 positions and VV holds 434; 250 of VGT's positions don't appear in VV at all, and they are 12.6% of VGT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VGT and VV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VGT vs VV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VGT as of 2026-06-30, VV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.