VOOV vs VTIVX: 26% overlap
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 share 26.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VOOV and VTIVX hold 436 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VOOV | in VTIVX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 7.3% | 2.8% | 4.5% |
| AMZN | 3.8% | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| TSLA | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| JPM | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| CASH | 0.5% | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| JNJ | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| XOM | 2.0% | 0.4% | 1.6% |
| INTC | 2.3% | 0.4% | 1.9% |
| V | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| WMT | 1.7% | 0.3% | 1.4% |
Where VOOV and VTIVX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VOOV | VTIVX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 8.0% | −8.0pp |
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 6.2% | −6.2pp |
| Health Care | 12.2% | 6.3% | +5.9pp |
| Consumer Staples | 8.8% | 3.7% | +5.1pp |
| Energy | 6.6% | 2.5% | +4.1pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.3% | 6.9% | +3.5pp |
| Information Technology | 20.5% | 23.8% | −3.3pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 0.0% | 2.6% | −2.6pp |
Δ is VOOV minus VTIVX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
0.3% of VOOV by weight, held in no part of VTIVX.
71.9% of VTIVX by weight, held in no part of VOOV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VOOV | VTIVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 23.8% | 21.4% |
| Positions held | 438 | 6 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $7 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VOOV and VTIVX overlap?
VOOV and VTIVX overlap 26.4% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 436 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VOOV as of 2026-06-30, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between VOOV and VTIVX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VOOV holds a stock at 6% and VTIVX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VOOV and VTIVX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 26.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VOOV own that VTIVX doesn't?
VOOV holds 438 positions and VTIVX holds 6; 2 of VOOV's positions don't appear in VTIVX at all, and they are 0.3% of VOOV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VOOV and VTIVX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VOOV vs VTIVX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VOOV as of 2026-06-30, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.