VT vs VTWAX: 100% overlap

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral share 100.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
1.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
100.0%
VT expense ratio
0.06%
VTWAX expense ratio
0.09%

Top shared holdings

VT and VTWAX hold 9,600 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin VTin VTWAXΔ
NVDA4.0%4.0%0.0%
AAPL3.6%3.6%0.0%
MSFT2.4%2.4%0.0%
AMZN2.0%2.0%0.0%
GOOGL1.8%1.8%0.0%
23301.6%1.6%0.0%
AVGO1.5%1.5%0.0%
GOOG1.4%1.4%0.0%
MU1.1%1.1%0.0%
META1.1%1.1%0.0%

Where VT and VTWAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorVTVTWAXΔ
Industrials11.5%11.5%+0.0pp
Utilities2.5%2.5%+0.0pp
Unclassified3.8%3.8%+0.0pp
Communication Services7.0%7.0%+0.0pp
Real Estate2.1%2.1%+0.0pp
Health Care7.7%7.7%+0.0pp
Information Technology30.1%30.1%+0.0pp
Financials14.9%14.9%+0.0pp

Δ is VT minus VTWAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in VT
0 positions

0.0% of VT by weight, held in no part of VTWAX.

Only in VTWAX
0 positions

0.0% of VTWAX by weight, held in no part of VT.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

VTVTWAX
Top 10 holdings20.5%20.5%
Positions held9,6009,600
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$6$9

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do VT and VTWAX overlap?

VT and VTWAX overlap 100.0% by portfolio weight — they are effectively the same fund. They share 9,600 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VT as of 2026-06-30, VTWAX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between VT and VTWAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VT holds a stock at 6% and VTWAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both VT and VTWAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 100.0% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: VT 0.06% versus VTWAX 0.09%.

What does VT own that VTWAX doesn't?

VT holds 9,600 positions and VTWAX holds 9,600; 0 of VT's positions don't appear in VTWAX at all, and they are 0.0% of VT by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares VT and VTWAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch VT vs VTWAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, VT as of 2026-06-30, VTWAX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.