VT vs VV: 55% overlap
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF share 55.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.4. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VT and VV hold 431 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VT | in VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 4.0% | 7.3% | 3.3% |
| AAPL | 3.6% | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| MSFT | 2.4% | 4.4% | 2.0% |
| AMZN | 2.0% | 3.6% | 1.7% |
| GOOGL | 1.8% | 3.3% | 1.5% |
| AVGO | 1.5% | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| GOOG | 1.4% | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| MU | 1.1% | 2.1% | 0.9% |
| META | 1.1% | 2.0% | 0.9% |
| TSLA | 1.1% | 1.9% | 0.8% |
Where VT and VV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VT | VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.1% | 38.1% | −8.0pp |
| Unclassified | 3.8% | 0.1% | +3.6pp |
| Financials | 14.9% | 11.6% | +3.3pp |
| Communication Services | 7.0% | 10.0% | −3.0pp |
| Industrials | 11.5% | 9.0% | +2.5pp |
| Materials | 3.3% | 1.6% | +1.7pp |
| Health Care | 7.7% | 8.9% | −1.2pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 1.0% | 0.4% | +0.5pp |
Δ is VT minus VV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
43.9% of VT by weight, held in no part of VV.
0.0% of VV by weight, held in no part of VT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VT | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 20.5% | 36.6% |
| Positions held | 9,600 | 434 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VT and VV overlap?
VT and VV overlap 55.0% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 431 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VT as of 2026-06-30, VV as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between VT and VV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VT holds a stock at 6% and VV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VT and VV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 55.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VT own that VV doesn't?
VT holds 9,600 positions and VV holds 434; 9,169 of VT's positions don't appear in VV at all, and they are 43.9% of VT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VT and VV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VT vs VV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VT as of 2026-06-30, VV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.