VT vs XLF: 7% overlap
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund share 6.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.9. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VT and XLF hold 76 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VT | in XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK-B | 0.7% | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| JPM | 0.7% | 11.9% | 11.2% |
| V | 0.5% | 7.4% | 6.9% |
| MA | 0.4% | 5.4% | 5.1% |
| BAC | 0.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| GS | 0.2% | 4.0% | 3.8% |
| WFC | 0.2% | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| MS | 0.2% | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| C | 0.2% | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| AXP | 0.2% | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Where VT and XLF differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VT | XLF | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | 14.9% | 99.9% | −85.0pp |
| Information Technology | 30.1% | 0.0% | +30.1pp |
| Industrials | 11.5% | 0.0% | +11.5pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.6% | 0.0% | +8.6pp |
| Health Care | 7.7% | 0.0% | +7.7pp |
| Communication Services | 7.0% | 0.0% | +7.0pp |
| Consumer Staples | 4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6pp |
| Unclassified | 3.8% | 0.0% | +3.8pp |
Δ is VT minus XLF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
92.6% of VT by weight, held in no part of XLF.
0.1% of XLF by weight, held in no part of VT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VT | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 20.5% | 57.0% |
| Positions held | 9,600 | 78 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VT and XLF overlap?
VT and XLF overlap 6.5% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 76 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VT as of 2026-06-30, XLF as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between VT and XLF calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VT holds a stock at 6% and XLF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VT and XLF?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 6.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VT own that XLF doesn't?
VT holds 9,600 positions and XLF holds 78; 9,524 of VT's positions don't appear in XLF at all, and they are 92.6% of VT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VT and XLF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VT vs XLF
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VT as of 2026-06-30, XLF as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.