VTIVX vs VTWAX: 80% overlap

Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral share 79.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.2Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.2. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
79.8%
VTIVX expense ratio
0.08%
VTWAX expense ratio
0.09%

Top shared holdings

VTIVX and VTWAX hold 9,494 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin VTIVXin VTWAXΔ
NVDA3.0%4.0%1.0%
AAPL2.8%3.6%0.8%
MSFT1.8%2.4%0.6%
AMZN1.5%2.0%0.5%
23301.4%1.6%0.2%
GOOGL1.4%1.8%0.4%
AVGO1.2%1.5%0.3%
GOOG1.1%1.4%0.3%
CASH1.9%1.0%1.0%
MU0.9%1.1%0.3%

Where VTIVX and VTWAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorVTIVXVTWAXΔ
Information Technology23.8%30.1%6.3pp
Treasuries6.2%0.0%+6.2pp
Unclassified8.0%3.8%+4.3pp
MBS Pass-Through2.6%0.0%+2.6pp
Corporate — industrial & other2.0%0.0%+2.0pp
Industrials9.6%11.5%1.9pp
Consumer Discretionary6.9%8.6%1.8pp
Communication Services5.4%7.0%1.6pp

Δ is VTIVX minus VTWAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in VTIVX
7,188 positions

18.7% of VTIVX by weight, held in no part of VTWAX.

Only in VTWAX
106 positions

0.6% of VTWAX by weight, held in no part of VTIVX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

VTIVXVTWAX
Top 10 holdings21.4%20.5%
Positions held69,600
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$8$9

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do VTIVX and VTWAX overlap?

VTIVX and VTWAX overlap 79.8% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 9,494 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, VTWAX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between VTIVX and VTWAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VTIVX holds a stock at 6% and VTWAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both VTIVX and VTWAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 79.8% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: VTIVX 0.08% versus VTWAX 0.09%.

What does VTIVX own that VTWAX doesn't?

VTIVX holds 6 positions and VTWAX holds 9,600; 7,188 of VTIVX's positions don't appear in VTWAX at all, and they are 18.7% of VTIVX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares VTIVX and VTWAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch VTIVX vs VTWAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, VTWAX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.