VTIVX vs XLP: 2% overlap
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund share 2.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VTIVX and XLP hold 35 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VTIVX | in XLP | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | 0.3% | 10.3% | 10.0% |
| COST | 0.3% | 8.9% | 8.7% |
| PG | 0.2% | 7.4% | 7.2% |
| PM | 0.2% | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| KO | 0.2% | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| CASH | 1.9% | 0.2% | 1.8% |
| PEP | 0.1% | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| MO | 0.1% | 4.5% | 4.5% |
| DG | 0.1% | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| EL | 0.1% | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Where VTIVX and XLP differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VTIVX | XLP | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | 3.7% | 99.7% | −96.0pp |
| Information Technology | 23.8% | 0.0% | +23.8pp |
| Financials | 13.3% | 0.0% | +13.3pp |
| Industrials | 9.6% | 0.0% | +9.6pp |
| Unclassified | 8.0% | 0.0% | +8.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.9% | 0.0% | +6.9pp |
| Health Care | 6.3% | 0.0% | +6.3pp |
| Treasuries | 6.2% | 0.0% | +6.2pp |
Δ is VTIVX minus XLP, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
96.0% of VTIVX by weight, held in no part of XLP.
0.0% of XLP by weight, held in no part of VTIVX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VTIVX | XLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 21.4% | 62.1% |
| Positions held | 6 | 37 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $8 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VTIVX and XLP overlap?
VTIVX and XLP overlap 2.2% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 35 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, XLP as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between VTIVX and XLP calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VTIVX holds a stock at 6% and XLP holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VTIVX and XLP?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.2% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VTIVX own that XLP doesn't?
VTIVX holds 6 positions and XLP holds 37; 16,647 of VTIVX's positions don't appear in XLP at all, and they are 96.0% of VTIVX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VTIVX and XLP. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VTIVX vs XLP
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VTIVX as of 2026-03-31, XLP as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.