AGG vs JEPQ: 2% overlap

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF share 1.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — JEPQ as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.8%
AGG expense ratio
0.03%
JEPQ expense ratio
0.35%

Top shared holdings

AGG and JEPQ hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin AGGin JEPQΔ
CASH2.7%1.8%0.8%

Where AGG and JEPQ differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorAGGJEPQΔ
Treasuries46.5%0.0%+46.5pp
Information Technology0.0%37.9%37.9pp
MBS Pass-Through24.1%0.0%+24.1pp
Unclassified0.0%22.3%22.3pp
Corporate — industrial & other14.3%0.0%+14.3pp
Communication Services0.0%12.0%12.0pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%10.0%10.0pp
Financials8.0%0.5%+7.5pp

Δ is AGG minus JEPQ, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in AGG
1,862 positions

99.4% of AGG by weight, held in no part of JEPQ.

Only in JEPQ
107 positions

96.6% of JEPQ by weight, held in no part of AGG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

AGGJEPQ
Top 10 holdings75.3%40.0%
Positions held1,864108
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$35

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do AGG and JEPQ overlap?

AGG and JEPQ overlap 1.8% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AGG as of 2026-07-23, JEPQ as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between AGG and JEPQ calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AGG holds a stock at 6% and JEPQ holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both AGG and JEPQ?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does AGG own that JEPQ doesn't?

AGG holds 1,864 positions and JEPQ holds 108; 1,862 of AGG's positions don't appear in JEPQ at all, and they are 99.4% of AGG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares AGG and JEPQ. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch AGG vs JEPQ

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, AGG as of 2026-07-23, JEPQ as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.