AGTHX vs MUB: 0% overlap
American Funds Growth Fund of America A and iShares National Muni Bond ETF share 0.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — AGTHX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AGTHX and MUB hold 0 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AGTHX | in MUB | Δ |
|---|
Where AGTHX and MUB differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AGTHX | MUB | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Tax-Backed | 0.0% | 30.7% | −30.7pp |
| Information Technology | 30.6% | 0.0% | +30.6pp |
| Utilities | 0.5% | 16.8% | −16.3pp |
| Local Tax-Backed | 0.0% | 14.9% | −14.9pp |
| Communication Services | 13.2% | 0.0% | +13.2pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.7% | 0.0% | +12.7pp |
| Health Care | 11.0% | 0.0% | +11.0pp |
| School Districts | 0.0% | 10.2% | −10.2pp |
Δ is AGTHX minus MUB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
98.9% of AGTHX by weight, held in no part of MUB.
101.0% of MUB by weight, held in no part of AGTHX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AGTHX | MUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 36.7% | 17.2% |
| Positions held | 309 | 969 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $61 | $5 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AGTHX and MUB overlap?
AGTHX and MUB overlap 0.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 0 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AGTHX as of 2026-02-28, MUB as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between AGTHX and MUB calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AGTHX holds a stock at 6% and MUB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AGTHX and MUB?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AGTHX own that MUB doesn't?
AGTHX holds 309 positions and MUB holds 969; 308 of AGTHX's positions don't appear in MUB at all, and they are 98.9% of AGTHX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AGTHX and MUB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AGTHX vs MUB
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AGTHX as of 2026-02-28, MUB as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.