AIVSX vs VTI: 46% overlap
American Funds Investment Company of America A and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF share 46.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — AIVSX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AIVSX and VTI hold 136 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AIVSX | in VTI | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 6.5% | 6.3% | 0.2% |
| MSFT | 5.7% | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| AMZN | 4.7% | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| GOOGL | 2.5% | 2.9% | 0.4% |
| AVGO | 6.1% | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| AAPL | 2.2% | 5.8% | 3.6% |
| GOOG | 2.1% | 2.3% | 0.1% |
| META | 2.6% | 1.7% | 0.9% |
| LLY | 3.4% | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| JPM | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.1% |
Where AIVSX and VTI differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AIVSX | VTI | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.2% | 35.2% | −6.1pp |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.2% | +5.3pp |
| Financials | 8.2% | 11.9% | −3.7pp |
| Consumer Staples | 6.4% | 4.3% | +2.0pp |
| Health Care | 11.2% | 9.5% | +1.7pp |
| Industrials | 11.8% | 10.4% | +1.4pp |
| Real Estate | 0.8% | 2.2% | −1.4pp |
| Energy | 1.9% | 3.1% | −1.2pp |
Δ is AIVSX minus VTI, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
12.7% of AIVSX by weight, held in no part of VTI.
40.3% of VTI by weight, held in no part of AIVSX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AIVSX | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 39.5% | 31.9% |
| Positions held | 168 | 3,495 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $58 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AIVSX and VTI overlap?
AIVSX and VTI overlap 46.0% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 136 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AIVSX as of 2026-03-31, VTI as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between AIVSX and VTI calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AIVSX holds a stock at 6% and VTI holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AIVSX and VTI?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 46.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AIVSX own that VTI doesn't?
AIVSX holds 168 positions and VTI holds 3,495; 32 of AIVSX's positions don't appear in VTI at all, and they are 12.7% of AIVSX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AIVSX and VTI. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AIVSX vs VTI
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AIVSX as of 2026-03-31, VTI as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.