AVUV vs VTHRX: 1% overlap
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 share 1.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — AVUV as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
AVUV and VTHRX hold 708 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in AVUV | in VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.3% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| CNR | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| EBS | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| AD | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| VAL | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| SEB | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| TRN | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| ABG | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| SIG | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| SLM | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Where AVUV and VTHRX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | AVUV | VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 16.8% | 1.9% | +15.0pp |
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 13.6% | −13.6pp |
| Financials | 24.1% | 11.3% | +12.7pp |
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 17.3% | −11.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.9% | 5.0% | +11.9pp |
| Industrials | 17.3% | 6.9% | +10.4pp |
| Unclassified | 3.5% | 13.3% | −9.8pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 0.0% | 5.7% | −5.7pp |
Δ is AVUV minus VTHRX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
6.6% of AVUV by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.
97.2% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of AVUV.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| AVUV | VTHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 8.5% | 28.9% |
| Positions held | 774 | 7 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $25 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do AVUV and VTHRX overlap?
AVUV and VTHRX overlap 1.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 708 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (AVUV as of 2026-02-28, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between AVUV and VTHRX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If AVUV holds a stock at 6% and VTHRX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both AVUV and VTHRX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does AVUV own that VTHRX doesn't?
AVUV holds 774 positions and VTHRX holds 7; 66 of AVUV's positions don't appear in VTHRX at all, and they are 6.6% of AVUV by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares AVUV and VTHRX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch AVUV vs VTHRX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, AVUV as of 2026-02-28, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.