BNDX vs SPLG: 1% overlap

Vanguard Total International Bond ETF and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (now SPYM) share 0.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.8%
BNDX expense ratio
0.07%
SPLG expense ratio
0.02%

Top shared holdings

BNDX and SPLG hold 40 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin BNDXin SPLGΔ
BAC0.1%0.6%0.5%
MS0.1%0.4%0.3%
CASH1.3%0.1%1.3%
JPM0.1%1.5%1.4%
Q0.0%0.0%0.0%
GS0.0%0.5%0.5%
MCD0.0%0.3%0.3%
CRH0.0%0.1%0.1%
MET0.0%0.1%0.0%
DLR0.0%0.1%0.1%

Where BNDX and SPLG differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorBNDXSPLGΔ
Unclassified88.4%0.0%+88.4pp
Information Technology0.1%37.5%37.4pp
Financials2.0%12.4%10.4pp
Communication Services0.1%9.3%9.2pp
Health Care0.2%9.1%9.0pp
Industrials0.0%8.9%8.8pp
Consumer Discretionary0.2%8.7%8.5pp
Consumer Staples0.1%4.6%4.5pp

Δ is BNDX minus SPLG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in BNDX
3,075 positions

97.9% of BNDX by weight, held in no part of SPLG.

Only in SPLG
466 positions

76.8% of SPLG by weight, held in no part of BNDX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

BNDXSPLG
Top 10 holdings24.4%36.9%
Positions held3,115507
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$7$2

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do BNDX and SPLG overlap?

BNDX and SPLG overlap 0.8% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 40 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BNDX as of 2026-06-30, SPLG as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between BNDX and SPLG calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BNDX holds a stock at 6% and SPLG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both BNDX and SPLG?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does BNDX own that SPLG doesn't?

BNDX holds 3,115 positions and SPLG holds 507; 3,075 of BNDX's positions don't appear in SPLG at all, and they are 97.9% of BNDX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares BNDX and SPLG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch BNDX vs SPLG

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, BNDX as of 2026-06-30, SPLG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.