FTIHX vs FXNAX: 1% overlap

Fidelity Total International Index and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index share 1.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-04-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
1.4%
FTIHX expense ratio
0.06%
FXNAX expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

FTIHX and FXNAX hold 2 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FTIHXin FXNAXΔ
CASH2.7%1.3%1.4%
UST0.1%45.4%45.4%

Where FTIHX and FXNAX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFTIHXFXNAXΔ
Unclassified94.6%9.5%+85.1pp
Treasuries0.1%45.4%45.4pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%16.5%16.5pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%14.1%14.1pp
Financials1.3%8.6%7.3pp
Utilities0.1%2.5%2.4pp
Cash and/or Derivatives2.7%1.3%+1.4pp
Sovereign0.0%1.1%1.1pp

Δ is FTIHX minus FXNAX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FTIHX
5,054 positions

97.6% of FTIHX by weight, held in no part of FXNAX.

Only in FXNAX
1,264 positions

54.5% of FXNAX by weight, held in no part of FTIHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FTIHXFXNAX
Top 10 holdings14.4%69.4%
Positions held5,0571,266
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$6$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FTIHX and FXNAX overlap?

FTIHX and FXNAX overlap 1.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 2 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, FXNAX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between FTIHX and FXNAX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FTIHX holds a stock at 6% and FXNAX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FTIHX and FXNAX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FTIHX own that FXNAX doesn't?

FTIHX holds 5,057 positions and FXNAX holds 1,266; 5,054 of FTIHX's positions don't appear in FXNAX at all, and they are 97.6% of FTIHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FTIHX and FXNAX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FTIHX vs FXNAX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, FXNAX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.