FTIHX vs SPLG: 0% overlap

Fidelity Total International Index and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (now SPYM) share 0.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.1%
FTIHX expense ratio
0.06%
SPLG expense ratio
0.02%

Top shared holdings

FTIHX and SPLG hold 4 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FTIHXin SPLGΔ
CASH2.7%0.1%2.7%
PPL0.1%0.0%0.0%
L0.1%0.0%0.0%
LULU0.0%0.0%0.0%

Where FTIHX and SPLG differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFTIHXSPLGΔ
Unclassified94.6%0.0%+94.6pp
Information Technology0.0%37.5%37.5pp
Financials1.3%12.4%11.0pp
Health Care0.0%9.1%9.1pp
Communication Services0.2%9.3%9.1pp
Industrials0.4%8.9%8.5pp
Consumer Discretionary0.3%8.7%8.5pp
Consumer Staples0.4%4.6%4.2pp

Δ is FTIHX minus SPLG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FTIHX
5,052 positions

97.6% of FTIHX by weight, held in no part of SPLG.

Only in SPLG
502 positions

99.8% of SPLG by weight, held in no part of FTIHX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FTIHXSPLG
Top 10 holdings14.4%36.9%
Positions held5,057507
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$6$2

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FTIHX and SPLG overlap?

FTIHX and SPLG overlap 0.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 4 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, SPLG as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between FTIHX and SPLG calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FTIHX holds a stock at 6% and SPLG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FTIHX and SPLG?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FTIHX own that SPLG doesn't?

FTIHX holds 5,057 positions and SPLG holds 507; 5,052 of FTIHX's positions don't appear in SPLG at all, and they are 97.6% of FTIHX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FTIHX and SPLG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FTIHX vs SPLG

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FTIHX as of 2026-04-30, SPLG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.