FXNAX vs IEMG: 0% overlap
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF share 0.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
FXNAX and IEMG hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in FXNAX | in IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 1.3% | 0.4% | 1.0% |
Where FXNAX and IEMG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | FXNAX | IEMG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasuries | 45.4% | 0.0% | +45.4pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 39.8% | −39.8pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 16.5% | 0.0% | +16.5pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 14.1% | 0.0% | +14.1pp |
| Unclassified | 9.5% | 0.0% | +9.5pp |
| Financials | 8.6% | 18.1% | −9.5pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.5% | −8.5pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 7.7% | −7.7pp |
Δ is FXNAX minus IEMG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.9% of FXNAX by weight, held in no part of IEMG.
98.9% of IEMG by weight, held in no part of FXNAX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| FXNAX | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 69.4% | 33.6% |
| Positions held | 1,266 | 2,790 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $9 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do FXNAX and IEMG overlap?
FXNAX and IEMG overlap 0.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, IEMG as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between FXNAX and IEMG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FXNAX holds a stock at 6% and IEMG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both FXNAX and IEMG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does FXNAX own that IEMG doesn't?
FXNAX holds 1,266 positions and IEMG holds 2,790; 1,265 of FXNAX's positions don't appear in IEMG at all, and they are 99.9% of FXNAX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares FXNAX and IEMG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch FXNAX vs IEMG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, IEMG as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.