FXNAX vs VGT: 0% overlap

Fidelity U.S. Bond Index and Vanguard Information Technology ETF share 0.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.4%
FXNAX expense ratio
0.03%
VGT expense ratio
0.09%

Top shared holdings

FXNAX and VGT hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin FXNAXin VGTΔ
CASH1.3%0.4%0.9%

Where FXNAX and VGT differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorFXNAXVGTΔ
Information Technology0.0%99.5%99.5pp
Treasuries45.4%0.0%+45.4pp
MBS Pass-Through16.5%0.0%+16.5pp
Corporate — industrial & other14.1%0.0%+14.1pp
Unclassified9.5%0.0%+9.5pp
Financials8.6%0.0%+8.6pp
Utilities2.5%0.0%+2.5pp
Sovereign1.1%0.0%+1.1pp

Δ is FXNAX minus VGT, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in FXNAX
1,265 positions

99.9% of FXNAX by weight, held in no part of VGT.

Only in VGT
321 positions

99.6% of VGT by weight, held in no part of FXNAX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

FXNAXVGT
Top 10 holdings69.4%59.9%
Positions held1,266322
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$9

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do FXNAX and VGT overlap?

FXNAX and VGT overlap 0.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, VGT as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between FXNAX and VGT calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If FXNAX holds a stock at 6% and VGT holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both FXNAX and VGT?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does FXNAX own that VGT doesn't?

FXNAX holds 1,266 positions and VGT holds 322; 1,265 of FXNAX's positions don't appear in VGT at all, and they are 99.9% of FXNAX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares FXNAX and VGT. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch FXNAX vs VGT

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, FXNAX as of 2026-02-28, VGT as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.