ITOT vs SWTSX: 90% overlap

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Schwab Total Stock Market Index share 90.2% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — SWTSX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.1Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.1. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
90.2%
ITOT expense ratio
0.03%
SWTSX expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

ITOT and SWTSX hold 2,251 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin ITOTin SWTSXΔ
NVDA7.0%6.9%0.1%
AAPL6.6%5.7%0.9%
MSFT3.9%4.3%0.4%
AMZN3.2%3.7%0.5%
GOOGL2.6%3.2%0.6%
AVGO2.6%2.8%0.2%
GOOG2.1%2.6%0.5%
META1.8%1.9%0.1%
TSLA1.2%1.5%0.3%
BRK-B1.3%1.2%0.0%

Where ITOT and SWTSX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorITOTSWTSXΔ
Unclassified0.0%3.4%3.4pp
Information Technology35.2%32.3%+2.9pp
Communication Services8.7%10.1%1.4pp
Health Care9.7%8.7%+1.1pp
Financials12.7%11.9%+0.8pp
Consumer Discretionary8.8%9.6%0.8pp
Industrials10.1%9.4%+0.8pp
Materials2.1%1.6%+0.4pp

Δ is ITOT minus SWTSX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in ITOT
188 positions

3.6% of ITOT by weight, held in no part of SWTSX.

Only in SWTSX
687 positions

3.5% of SWTSX by weight, held in no part of ITOT.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

ITOTSWTSX
Top 10 holdings32.7%33.9%
Positions held2,4402,939
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do ITOT and SWTSX overlap?

ITOT and SWTSX overlap 90.2% by portfolio weight — they are effectively the same fund. They share 2,251 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (ITOT as of 2026-07-23, SWTSX as of 2026-04-30).

How is the overlap between ITOT and SWTSX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If ITOT holds a stock at 6% and SWTSX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both ITOT and SWTSX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 90.2% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: ITOT 0.03% versus SWTSX 0.03%.

What does ITOT own that SWTSX doesn't?

ITOT holds 2,440 positions and SWTSX holds 2,939; 188 of ITOT's positions don't appear in SWTSX at all, and they are 3.6% of ITOT by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares ITOT and SWTSX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch ITOT vs SWTSX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, ITOT as of 2026-07-23, SWTSX as of 2026-04-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.